by OPP Football Group

Indonesia Football Federation

Advanced Coaching Workshop

Advanced Coaching Education

Modern Player Development

A Scientific Approach to Football Coaching
Inspired by La Masia Methodology

Coaches as Facilitators

Architects of Environments, Not Trainers

The Fundamental Shift
Research from Barcelona's La Masia and modern sports science

Traditional Model

Coach as instructor, players as receivers. Linear, prescriptive approach.

Modern Model

Coach as facilitator, players as active learners. Non-linear, adaptive approach.

Key Research

  • • Renshaw et al. (2016) - Ecological Dynamics
  • • Davids et al. (2013) - Constraints-Led Approach
  • • La Masia Methodology (FC Barcelona)

💡 Core Principle

"We don't train players. We design environments where players discover solutions through exploration and adaptation."

Participant Case: Designing an Environment
Think about your current training setup

Challenge: Your U15 team struggles with decision-making under pressure in the final third.

Constraint-Led Approach

Designing Environments for Learning

What Are Constraints?
Constraints shape behavior without prescribing it
Task Constraints
  • Rules
  • Goals
  • Equipment
  • Time limits
Environment Constraints
  • Pitch size
  • Surface
  • Weather
  • Space
Individual Constraints
  • Body size
  • Fitness
  • Experience
  • Cognitive load
Research Foundation
Ecological Dynamics & Constraints-Led Approach

Key Principle

"Behavior emerges from the interaction between the individual, task, and environment. By manipulating constraints, we guide players toward desired solutions without prescribing them."

- Davids, Button & Bennett (2008)

Skill vs Technique

Understanding the Fundamental Difference

Technique
What we often focus on
  • • Isolated movement pattern
  • • Reproducible in controlled conditions
  • • "Perfect" execution
  • • Coach-prescribed
  • • Limited transfer to game

Example

Practicing passing against a wall - same distance, same angle, no pressure

Skill
What we should develop
  • • Adaptive movement solution
  • • Context-dependent performance
  • • Effective in game situations
  • • Player-discovered
  • • High transfer to competition

Example

Passing in small-sided game with defenders, changing angles, time pressure

Key Insight

Technique is a tool. Skill is the ability to use that tool effectively in context.

Research shows that skill development requires variability, not repetition of identical movements. Players need to explore different solutions to similar problems.

Reference: Newell (1986) - Constraints model of motor learning

Measuring the Brain

Cognitive Load & Performance

We Measure Weights - Why Not the Brain?
Just as we add/remove weights to build strength safely, we must measure cognitive load

Physical Load Monitoring

  • ✓ GPS tracking
  • ✓ Heart rate zones
  • ✓ Training load calculations
  • ✓ Recovery metrics

Cognitive Load Monitoring

  • Decision-making complexity
  • Information processing demands
  • Perceptual-cognitive load
  • Task complexity ratings

What is Cognitive Load?

The mental effort required to process information and make decisions. Too high = overload, errors, fatigue. Too low = boredom, no challenge, no learning.

How We Measure It

1. Task Complexity Analysis

Number of decisions, information sources, time pressure

2. Player Self-Report

RPE (Rate of Perceived Exertion) for cognitive load

3. Behavioral Indicators

Decision speed, error rates, communication patterns

4. Performance Metrics

Success rates, adaptation patterns, learning curves

Cognitive Load Calculation

Interactive density visualization

Hover to see cognitive load calculation

Move into crowded areas to see load increase

Orange lines: Press directions from opponents. Multiple directions = higher cognitive load.

Green lines: Passing options to teammates. More options = more decisions = higher load.

Move between formation lines to see how pressure zones affect cognitive load in real-time.

Micro, Meso, Macro

How Small Factors Impact Big Performance

Micro
Individual moments, decisions, actions

Examples:

  • Single pass
  • One decision
  • Moment of perception
Impact: Builds the foundation
Meso
Training sessions, weekly cycles

Examples:

  • Session design
  • Weekly load
  • Recovery protocols
Impact: Shapes development
Macro
Season, career, club culture

Examples:

  • Long-term plan
  • Club identity
  • Development pathway
Impact: Determines outcomes
Understanding the Connection

Every macro outcome (winning matches, developing players) emerges from thousands of micro moments, organized through meso structures (training, planning).

Example: Player Development

Micro: Player makes decision in small-sided game

Meso: Weekly training program shapes decision-making patterns

Macro: Season-long development creates adaptable, intelligent player

Biological vs Chronological Age

Understanding Player Development Stages

The Critical Difference
Two players can be the same age but at completely different development stages

Chronological Age

The number of years since birth. Easy to measure, but often misleading.

Example: Two 14-year-olds

Same chronological age, but...

Biological Age

The actual physical and developmental maturity. This is what matters for training.

Player A: Biological age 12.5 (early developer)

Player B: Biological age 15.5 (late developer)

Same age, different needs!

⚠️ The Problem with Early Selection

Academies often select 11-year-olds as goalkeepers or specialize positions early. But we have no idea how tall they'll be or how they'll develop. Late bloomers often succeed because they avoid early specialization stress.

How We Measure Biological Age

1. Khamis-Roche Method

Uses height, weight, age, and parental height to predict adult height and maturity

2. Mirwald PHV (Peak Height Velocity)

Predicts when a player will hit their growth spurt - critical for training load

3. Maturity Offset

Years from/before peak height velocity - determines training zones

References: Khamis & Roche (1994), Mirwald et al. (2002)

Data-Driven Grouping

Research-based player optimization

Hover over zone labels to isolate groups • Click players to view details

Visualization:

This scatter chart shows players plotted by biological maturity (%) vs PTC score. Players in different zones need different training approaches.

Cognitive Load Parameters

Measuring & Adapting for Groups

Key Parameters We Track
Decision Frequency

How many decisions per minute

Adapt: Adjust game size, rules complexity
Information Sources

Visual, auditory, proprioceptive cues

Adapt: Add/remove defenders, change space
Time Pressure

Time available for decisions

Adapt: Modify pitch size, touch limits
Task Complexity

Number of simultaneous objectives

Adapt: Simplify or add constraints
Cultural Considerations

Cognitive load is influenced by cultural factors. Indonesian players may process information differently than European players. We must adapt our measurements and interventions accordingly.

Example Adaptations:

  • • Communication styles (verbal vs non-verbal)
  • • Learning preferences (visual vs kinesthetic)
  • • Social dynamics in group settings
  • • Cultural values around competition and cooperation

Return to Play Protocols

Load Monitoring & Thresholds

Structured Progression
Every step is data-driven, not guesswork
Phase 1: Recovery

Threshold:

Pain-free, full range of motion

Load:

0% of baseline

Next Step:

When threshold met for 3 consecutive days

Phase 2: Controlled Loading

Threshold:

No pain during or after activity

Load:

25-50% of baseline

Next Step:

When load tolerance increases

Phase 3: Progressive Loading

Threshold:

No pain, normal movement patterns

Load:

50-75% of baseline

Next Step:

When movement quality maintained

Phase 4: Return to Training

Threshold:

Full function, match-ready fitness

Load:

75-100% of baseline

Next Step:

When all metrics normalized

Load Monitoring Tools

Physical Load

  • • GPS metrics (distance, speed)
  • • Heart rate zones
  • • Training load calculations
  • • Subjective RPE

Cognitive Load

  • • Decision-making frequency
  • • Task complexity ratings
  • • Perceptual load indicators
  • • Cognitive RPE

Player Development Plans

Beyond Documents: Anchoring Development

❌ What It's NOT

A document that says "passing-oriented" and "4-3-3 formation" - that's just words on paper.

  • • Vague descriptions without action
  • • Tactical formations without context
  • • Generic goals without specificity
  • • Documents that sit in folders
✅ What It IS

1. Constraints

Specific environmental modifications that guide behavior. "Narrow width (30m) to encourage quick passing decisions"

2. Points/Rewards

Scoring systems that reinforce desired behaviors. "3 points for passes that break lines, 1 point for possession"

3. Consequences

Natural outcomes of actions. "Lose possession = immediate counter-attack opportunity for opponent"

Example: "Passing-Oriented" Plan

Constraint: 3-touch maximum, narrow pitch

Points: +2 for line-breaking passes, +1 for possession

Consequence: Turnover = opponent gets 2v1 advantage

Types of Constraints

Task, Environment & Individual

Task Constraints
  • Touch limits (1-touch, 2-touch)
  • Scoring rules (only headers count)
  • Time limits (30-second attacks)
  • Player roles (must pass before shooting)
Environment Constraints
  • Pitch dimensions (narrow/wide)
  • Number of goals (1, 2, or 4)
  • Zones (attacking/defending areas)
  • Surface conditions
Individual Constraints
  • Body size and strength
  • Fitness level
  • Experience and skill
  • Cognitive load capacity
Designing with Constraints

Effective constraint design requires understanding what behavior you want to emerge, then manipulating constraints to guide players toward that behavior naturally.

Example: Developing Quick Decision-Making

Task: 2-touch maximum

Environment: Small pitch (20x15m), 4v4

Individual: Match players of similar cognitive load capacity

Result: Players must scan and decide quickly, naturally developing decision-making speed

Perception Exercises

Low to High to Low Uncertainty

The Uncertainty Progression
Building perceptual skills through controlled variability
Low Uncertainty

Predictable, controlled environment

Example: Passing to stationary target, known distance

Purpose: Build confidence, establish patterns

High Uncertainty

Variable, unpredictable environment

Example: Passing with moving targets, defenders, changing angles

Purpose: Challenge perception, force adaptation

Back to Low

Return to controlled, but with new skills

Example: Same drill as phase 1, but player now has better scanning

Purpose: Consolidate learning, demonstrate improvement

Why This Works

Research in ecological psychology shows that perception and action are coupled. By manipulating uncertainty, we force players to develop better perceptual skills (scanning, anticipation, pattern recognition) which directly improve performance.

Reference: Gibson (1979) - Ecological approach to visual perception

Everyday Athlete & Fascia System

Holistic Movement Systems

Beyond Muscles: The Fascia System

Traditional training focuses on muscles. But movement is a whole-body system, connected through fascia - the web of connective tissue that links everything.

Traditional View

  • • Isolated muscle groups
  • • Linear force production
  • • Strength = bigger muscles

Holistic View

  • • Integrated movement chains
  • • Multi-directional force
  • • Strength = efficient fascia system
Everyday Athlete Principle

Players are athletes 24/7, not just during training. Their movement patterns, recovery, nutrition, and daily activities all contribute to performance.

Holistic Approach Includes:

  • • Movement quality in all activities
  • • Recovery and sleep patterns
  • • Nutrition throughout the day
  • • Stress management
  • • Postural awareness

Late Bloomers

The Advantage of Late Specialization

⚠️ The Early Selection Problem

Academies often make critical mistakes:

  • Selecting 11-year-olds as goalkeepers when we don't know their adult height
  • Specializing positions too early, limiting development
  • Focusing on early developers who may plateau
✅ Why Late Bloomers Succeed

Less Stress

Not picked as "elite" early, they avoid pressure and burnout

Broader Development

Play multiple positions, develop diverse skills

Natural Growth

Physical development happens naturally, not forced

Intrinsic Motivation

Love for the game drives them, not external pressure

Club Strategy

First: Understand what kind of athletes we want to play. Really broad player archetypes.

Second: Understand what attributes players seem to have. Don't force positions early.

Later: At appropriate age, specify and make them ready for men's team or export. But keep the foundation broad.

Data-Driven Decisions

It's About the Athletes, Not Us

❌ The Problem with Raw Data

Raw data and raw numbers are often brought forward when it's too late. Still, people don't know what to do with it.

  • • Data collected but not analyzed
  • • Numbers without context
  • • Information overload
  • • No actionable insights
✅ Data for Athletes

Data should serve the athletes, not the coaches' egos. Every metric should answer: "How does this help this specific player develop?"

What Data Should Do:

  • • Inform training decisions
  • • Identify development needs
  • • Prevent injuries
  • • Optimize performance

What Data Should NOT Do:

  • • Create pressure on players
  • • Justify coach decisions
  • • Overwhelm with numbers
  • • Replace coach intuition
We Are Architects of Environments

Data helps us design better environments. It's not about proving we're right - it's about creating the best conditions for player development.

Example:

Data shows player has high cognitive load. Instead of pushing harder, we design simpler exercises to build confidence, then gradually increase complexity.

PTC Score & Biological Age

The Golden Combination

Understanding the Metrics
PTC Score
Perception, Thinking, Control

Measures a player's cognitive football ability:

  • Perception: How well they see and read the game
  • Thinking: Decision-making quality and speed
  • Control: Technical execution under pressure
Scale: 0-100 (higher = better cognitive football ability)
Biological Age
Actual Developmental Maturity

Measures where a player is in their physical development:

  • Maturity %: How far through puberty
  • PHV: Peak Height Velocity timing
  • Offset: Years from growth spurt
Use: Determines training zones and load management

The Golden Combination

When we combine PTC score with biological age, we get a complete picture:

High PTC + Early Developer: May need challenge to avoid boredom

High PTC + Late Developer: Protect physically, develop cognitively

Low PTC + Early Developer: Focus on cognitive development

Low PTC + Late Developer: Broad development, avoid early specialization

Data-Driven Grouping

Research-based player optimization

Hover over zone labels to isolate groups • Click players to view details

Visualization:

Players plotted by biological maturity (%) vs PTC score. Each zone requires different training approaches.

Player Archetypes

Resolver, Organizer, Executor, Orchestrator

Resolver
Adaptive problem-solver, finds solutions in chaos
  • Adapts quickly
  • Creative solutions
  • Thrives under pressure
Organizer
Structures play, creates order from complexity
  • Sees patterns
  • Controls tempo
  • Distributes effectively
Executor
Direct action, decisive and powerful
  • Quick decisions
  • Direct play
  • High intensity
Orchestrator
Conducts the game, coordinates team actions
  • Vision
  • Leadership
  • Game management
Understanding Archetypes

These archetypes help us understand how players think and play. They're not fixed positions - a player can be an Organizer in one situation and an Executor in another.

How We Use This:

  • • Design exercises that challenge their archetype
  • • Create environments where their strengths emerge
  • • Develop complementary skills (Resolver learns to organize)
  • • Build teams with diverse archetypes

Club Identity & Collaboration

Development Based on Club, Not Coach

❌ Coach-Dependent Development

When development depends on individual coaches:

  • • Inconsistent methods when coaches change
  • • Players adapt to coach, not club philosophy
  • • No continuity in development pathway
  • • Success tied to specific individuals
✅ Club-Based Development

Player and talent development should not be based on the coach. It should be based on the club itself.

Club Identity

  • • Clear playing philosophy
  • • Consistent methodology
  • • Shared language and concepts
  • • Long-term vision

Collaboration

  • • All coaches follow same principles
  • • Players progress through system
  • • Development pathway is clear
  • • Success is sustainable
The Same Red Line

Whether it's a collaboration club or a single club, there should be the same red line - a consistent philosophy that guides all development decisions.

Example: La Masia

FC Barcelona's academy has maintained the same philosophy for decades, regardless of which coaches work there. The club identity is stronger than any individual.

Nutrition & Performance

Fueling Development

Nutrition for Development
Not just performance, but growth and recovery
Growth Support

Adequate protein, calcium, vitamins for growing bodies

Training Fuel

Carbohydrates for energy, timing around sessions

Recovery

Protein for muscle repair, hydration for all systems

Cultural Considerations

Nutrition advice must respect cultural food preferences and traditions. We work with what players eat, not against it.

Indonesian Context:

  • • Traditional foods can be adapted for performance
  • • Meal timing around training schedules
  • • Hydration in tropical climate
  • • Family meal patterns and social eating

Building Exercises

Environment, Decision, Consequence

The Three Pillars of Exercise Design
Environment
The space, constraints, and conditions
  • What size pitch?
  • How many players?
  • What are the boundaries?
  • What equipment is used?
Decision
What choices must players make?
  • When to pass vs dribble?
  • Where to move?
  • How to create space?
  • When to press?
Consequence
What happens based on actions?
  • What happens if you lose the ball?
  • How do you score points?
  • What are the rewards?
  • What are the penalties?
Example: Building a Passing Exercise

Environment:

30x20m pitch, 4v4, narrow width encourages quick passing, two small goals at each end

Decision:

Players must decide: pass forward, pass sideways, or dribble. Must make decision within 2 touches.

Consequence:

Score by passing through opponent's goal = 3 points. Lose possession = opponent gets immediate counter-attack with +1 player advantage.

Constraint-Led Thinking

Every element of the exercise is a constraint that shapes behavior. By manipulating constraints, we guide players toward desired solutions.

Holistic Approach:

Consider physical, cognitive, and social constraints together. An exercise that's physically easy but cognitively challenging might be perfect for a late developer.

Adaptive Training Flow

Real-time adjustments based on Team DNA

Cognitive Load
45%
LowHigh
Physical Load
55%
LowHigh

Team DNA

Cognitive:
45%
Physical:
55%

AI Analysis

Loads within optimal range

Adjusted Intervals

Work Period45s
Rest Period25s

Exercise Timeline

Work
Rest

How it works: Adjust the sliders above to see how Team DNA (cognitive and physical load) automatically adjusts work and rest periods in real-time. High load = shorter work, longer rest. Low load = longer work, shorter rest.

Visualization:

This shows how exercise design adapts based on player needs, constraints, and desired outcomes.

Continue Your Learning Journey

These principles are the foundation of modern player development.
Apply them, adapt them, and watch your players flourish.

1 / 20